Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glorei


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. henrik • talk  21:30, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Glorei

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete Unsourced; no indication of notability; promotional; creater was advised and given the opportunity to improve the article but has declined to do so. Rklawton (talk) 16:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Hello There! I am already working on improving the quality and references of this article, may i kindly have the prod tag - which I mistakenly removed - again and get a couple of days to complete the article improvement process? Thank you for your cooperation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afrokhalid (talk • contribs) 16:52, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
 * You removed the prod tag twice and were advised of the consequences. This AfD will take a week. If you can improve the article, then it will no doubt be kept. However, you must demonstrate the subject's notability using reliable sources. If you have a conflict of interest, you must also declare that on your user page and on the article's talk page. Rklawton (talk) 16:56, 22 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Rorshacma (talk) 17:10, 22 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Totally did not decline its just that getting myself familiarized with the tags and laws again is taking me sometime thou am a coder.. I am hoping to save my only contribution to this great project and once i overcome the deletion issue, i will try to even seek help from other contributers and try to expand to the article in order to reflect why it is so important to keep this article.. I totally understand where you are coming from thou.. I have added some references but somehow were removed! its taking time for providing references as I am trying to select appropriate links; i.e. ones that fit into the wikipedia criteria. Some help in this regard would be highly valued.

Afrokhalid (talk • contribs) —Preceding undated comment added 18:05, 22 February 2012 (UTC).
 * Speedy Delete as promotional and non notable corporation Fiddle Faddle (talk) 00:14, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - Found these sources:
 * (Stated as sourced from the Oman Daily Observer): GLOREI backs Oman Capital Markets Forum as silver sponsor.
 * (Stated as sourced from the Times of Oman): Tawafuq formed.


 * Found this that may possibly (or may not) be a reprint of a press release:
 * From Oman Economic Review: Quality matters
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 01:50, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - For now, based upon the likelihood of sources that address the topic with significant coverage. (See the first two sources in my comment above.) Northamerica1000(talk) 01:52, 23 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Insufficient coverage in reliable sources to satisfy guidelines at WP:CORP. ukexpat (talk) 14:53, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.