Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gloria Marie James


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete per WP:SNOW and WP:NOTINHERITED. There is zero evidence of her being notable, which is not inherited. There is also a high risk this will become an attack page on a private person; the focus of the page is on her giving birth at a young age. While I assume that is not the creator's intent, I don't want to feed the trolls, class of 2015. Bearian (talk) 22:03, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Gloria Marie James

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Being a notable person's mother doesn't mean she is notable. See WP:NOTINHERITED. Her info can be included in LeBron James — Chris! c / t 19:36, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete since the only claim of notability that the article makes is invalid per WP:NOTINHERITED. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 19:38, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  20:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  20:13, 8 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete or merge. She gets a few notability credit points for being someone's mother, but LeBron James isn't himself significant enough to push her over the notability threshold.   Barney the barney barney (talk) 20:16, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability is not inherited from family members per WP:NOTINHERITED, and I don't see in-depth coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources per WP:GNG.  The current lack of substance in the article speaks volumes.  It's an interesting story, and she deserves a sentence or two in her son's bio.  Remember: even if she satisfied the general notability guidelines, that is not a guarantee that the subject should have a stand-alone article per WP:N.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:24, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.