Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glory Farm Primary School (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bicester content is under the redirect if consensus develops for a merge Star   Mississippi  02:05, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Glory Farm Primary School
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Primary school which fails WP:NSCHOOL - lacking significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. AusLondonder (talk) 17:45, 2 May 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Please consider whether a redirect or a merge to a different target page would be best. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:17, 10 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk &#124; contribs) 00:21, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education, Schools,  and England. AusLondonder (talk) 17:46, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable subject in the context of a global encyclopaedia, which is not supposed to over-represent minor subjects from Anglosphere countries, but would accept a Redirect to List of schools in Oxfordshire if it is considered a plausible enough search term. RobinCarmody (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge to Bicester which seems more appropriate than the list for if more content than the name is desired to be included.  Crouch, Swale  ( talk ) 10:19, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete article doesn't meet notability criteria. As WP:WHYN states, "If only a few sentences could be written and supported by sources about the subject, that subject does not qualify for a separate page". SamWilson989 (talk) 01:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.