Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glow Artisan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete under G11 (exclusively promotional page). Mkativerata (talk) 00:05, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Glow Artisan

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Written as a how-to guide, in contradiction of WP:NOT, completely unreferenced, no evidence of notability. Terrillja talk  21:50, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * It had already been speedy-tagged before the article creator deleted the tag; you probably could have just reverted it. Half  Shadow  21:53, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't think that it necessarily falls under g11, it's borderline at least, and there is no criteria for a WP:NOT violation beyond WP:IAR. So here we are.-- Terrillja talk  21:58, 25 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Speedy please re-tag this for speedy, it's a G11 violation and the article creator was the one removing the speedy. Fæ (talk) 21:56, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * If you feel so, feel free to replace the tag. It can be tagged for AfD and CSD at the same time if you feel that the CSD is appropriate, I do not feel that it is however.-- Terrillja talk  21:58, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not unambiguously spam, but contravenes WP:NOT and is not notable. I've restored the AfD notice that User:HalfShadow removed (while leaving the csd tag in place ... who knows, a passing admin might consider it a G11!). Jimmy Pitt   talk  22:32, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.