Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glow of Hope


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 02:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Glow of Hope

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I see no evidence of major critical attention to this painting  DGG ( talk ) 06:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as searches only found expected mentions at Books, News and WP:INDAFD, nothing convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  06:36, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete it looks like someone's thesis/essay about the painting. Maximum, make it shorter and merge to Sawlaram Haldankar Arthistorian1977 (talk) 19:40, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a highly notable painting, and the pride of the museum. We need to search harder for references as there are systemic reasons these tend not to be in English and online. Shreevatsa (talk) 23:13, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:18, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:15, 18 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep If it's not being disputed that it has its own room at the museum someone there obviously finds it notable. Sparafucil (talk) 09:28, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 13:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * keep reasonable artistic notability verified. - üser:Altenmann >t 16:05, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: I'm with and  on this one.  Lots of paintings have their own nook in a museum.  Fails WP:GNG. Chrisw80 (talk) 07:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a notable painting. More searches need to be conducted in Indian languages other than English and in printed works. Has anyone examined printed works from the 1940's or 50's? AusLondonder (talk) 23:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.