Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glyptothorax conirostris


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. (non-admin closure) - NQ (talk)  13:22, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Glyptothorax conirostris

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet stub criteria. Belongs in https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Main_Page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atsme (talk • contribs)
 * Huh? All correctly described species are considered notable. See WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES. Suggest speedily closing this (and the similarly ill-considered rest of this catfish-o-cide, if they keep cropping up) --Elmidae (talk) 12:15, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy keep: All properly sourced articles about correctly described species are inherently notable per WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES. This Afd-nomination, and the PRODding of more than a dozen other articles about rare and endangered fish species that I have created, has been made in bad faith by the nominator, as an attempt to get back at me for voicing an opinion about WP:AVDUCK (an essay created by the nominator) that the nominator didn't like. Thomas.W talk 12:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.