Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GmailFS


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn --  Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 06:10, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

GmailFS

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unnotable GMail hack. No significant coverage in reliable, third-party sources. Prod removed by random IP with not of "rm PROD - lots of ghits, several gnews hits" however, an actual check shows none except for a single non-English one that looks like a blog. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 08:06, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  —  Jujutacular  T · C 10:31, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  —  Jujutacular  T · C 10:31, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Slashdot,, --Cyber cobra  (talk) 11:38, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * What makes linuxreviews and technie-buzz reliable? -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 16:39, 15 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep: Per Cybercobra. Joe Chill (talk) 13:44, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I find it very funny that you consider the New York Times a useless source. It also has coverage in several books... from people like ORA  . 76.66.197.2 (talk) 05:40, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * It says "GmailFS" in passing in reference to another software, certainly not significant coverage. The book results, however, are more interesting. Be nice if some of this discovered notability were actually added to the article though that rarely seems to be the result of an AfD. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 06:08, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.