Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gmail Talk emoticons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Will recreate as a redirect to emoticon. Never mind. --Core des at 19:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Gmail Talk emoticons


It's a list. Of Google Talk emoticons. I don't know if it should be merged or just deleted. JDtalk 12:45, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge what's important (which is basically that Gmail Talk uses animated emoticons). This list should be sourced and what is relevant should be merged into Gmail.  Doing a simple google search for "gmail emoticons" brought up several lists very similar to this one.  Apparently, Google itself released a list of the emoticons.  Gmail's moving emoticons don't merit an article of their own - they're just one relatively small feature in the notable webmail server.  Srose   (talk)  12:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete sub-trivial original research. Guy 14:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and this is definitely indiscriminate, unencyclopedic information. There are a lot of interesting things regarding Google Talk that are, in fact, discussed on Google Talk; this is just trivial information that does not apply to the article in terms of importance, history, technical information, or other information important to Google Talk. – Mipadi 14:51, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Smileycruft.-- Hús  ö  nd  18:27, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Ultra Strong Keep Important internet thingy. --172.148.158.110 18:41, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The fact that Google Talk supports emoticons might be worth mentioning (it's probably mentioned already, though). The specific list, though, doesn't add anything to the reader's understanding of Google Talk - particularly as most of these are pretty standard, and I expect the list is available from within the client. As a side note, there isn't even any such thing as an "animated png" (at least, not supported in any common browser). Zetawoof(&zeta;) 20:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. How did this make it all the way to Afd? v_v --- RockMFR 04:53, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Listcruft. We are not a collection of such things. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 19:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.