Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gnarwl (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 01:05, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Gnarwl
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Found no notability. This software fails WP:N. SL93 (talk) 23:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: I listed the first AfD in 2009 before my username was changed to SL93. The first AfD had no comments. SL93 (talk) 23:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Notability not established. Only source is not "third party". Tigerboy1966 (talk) 02:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: all I found is several howtos (AFAIK, unsuitable for the purpose of determining notability) and a University of Prague diploma practice report (don't know what is the correct word about describing the obligatory practice needed for graduation) devoting 2 sections about 20 words each (didn't count) to the software and describing its use in building a corporate mail system. Not enough, I believe, though I can't imagine the sources that would estabish notability for the utility of a kind. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 14:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability not established.Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:37, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.