Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gnophkeh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Gnophkeh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 18:59, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:59, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:59, 2 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Don't see how this differs any from Voormis. Same sources, mostly. Possibly merge somewhere. Hyperbolick (talk) 20:57, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete These creatures have never received any meaningful coverage from an academic or journalistic publication. &#8213; Susmuffin Talk 00:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails GNG. Happily survives at https://lovecraft.fandom.com/wiki/Gnoph-keh --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. Fails GNG. Content survives on fandom.com.Kacper IV (talk) 12:22, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG, yet a bit more fancruft.  Onel 5969  TT me 03:17, 9 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.