Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go-Back (watch)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 16:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Go-Back (watch)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable item from a non-notable book written by a non-notable author.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  03:17, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete- the reasoning I gave in the PROD is still valid- there's not nearly enough notability for anything in that book to have a separate article. Bradjamesbrown (talk) 03:22, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Delete  - as nominator.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  03:26, 17 January 2010 (UTC) struck redundant opinion of nominator. Bongo   matic  16:04, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- Bradjamesbrown (talk) 03:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong delete unencyclopaedic, too short, and non-notable. (Whoever heard if a fictional watch having its own article.) Plus, it is uncategorised and unreferenced.  Kayau  Odyssey  HUCK FINN   to the lighthouse  BACK FROM EXAMS 04:03, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete but let's not pile on things that aren't valid reasons for deletion. Non-notable topic. Drmies (talk) 04:14, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, wildly non-notable. Hairhorn (talk) 05:03, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Non-notable watch in a non-notable book by a non-notable author. Joe Chill (talk) 17:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete the book is at least somewhat notable, but not this item. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  21:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable in-world item from non-notable novel. Bongo  matic  16:04, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.