Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoGo Tech


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salting can be requested on WP:RFPP Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:44, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

GoGo Tech

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I honestly would've only PROded but given how blatant and persistently motivated such advertisements are, I wouldn't be surprised if it's restarted soon so here we are; everything listed here is a blatant advertisement, regardless of who and what was mentioned in this article, and the 2 sources listed are clearly republished advertising, and there's honestly nothing both genuinely non-advert and notable here hence deletion is the only solution. Also, it's important to note the 2 advertising-only involved accounts bypassed AfC, see Draft:GoGo Tech Limited (note this Draft also had both only advertising information and links) and simply started the fullblown advertisement themselves. SwisterTwister  talk  20:53, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete One PR blogspam and one local source. Not notable. Jergling (talk) 22:52, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and Salt – Gogovan COI accounts have been spamming this company on Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons relentlessly over the past year, i.e. Gogovan, GOGOVAN, and, GoGoVan, all repeatedly deleted and recreated until being salted. Countless spam images on Commons have been deleted, i.e. 1, 2, 3, 4. Once this article is deleted I predict it will simply be recreated, and once this namespace is salted it will be recreated at GoGo Tech Limited. Dear GoGoVan: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a means of promotion. Advertise elsewhere! Citobun (talk) 18:03, 20 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.