Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GoPets


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 08:30, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

GoPets
GoPets doesnt appear to meet the WP:WEB notability standards required for listing in Wikipedia. Notability certainly isnt asserted in the artcle. In its current form therefore I suggest it should be deleted MidgleyDJ 08:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. (Note: alexa ~ 42000: ). MER-C 08:34, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Article is pretty well written. The interview with IGN makes it slightly more notable. The article could use more editing to keep it more NPOV. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chicbicyclist (talk • contribs).
 * Weak Keep, per above ,wouldn't say it's completely Non-notable, plus I wouldn't go by website alone just yet, Konami just released a game for the Nintendo DS called GoPets, Release Date: Fall 2006.-- Sirex 98  10:29, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep, removing weak keep from my opinion after reading more about GoPets I would say it is notable, the article has been wikified & clean up since the time it was tagged in July. -- Sirex 98  09:04, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep due to Nintendo DS game by Konami. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  11:33, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep due to it being notable (it's on par to Neopets) and the game coming out. --pIrish 13:15, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. The game is coming out, and there's an interview with IGN that makes it slightly more notable. The article is good, just needs screenshot of the normal GoPets logo... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Abby724 (talk • contribs).
 * Keep. Why not make an attempt to fix the article before AfDing it? - Lex 04:36, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Yes lets edit it rather than remove it —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Snoopyd (talk • contribs).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.