Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go (verb) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Go (verb)
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTDICTIONARY Ypnypn (talk) 02:15, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Yes, it's a word. But it's a very important word which most of us use every day.  Also the article gives some history which takes it beyond a mere dictionary definition. BayShrimp (talk) 05:31, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep, this word is of interest because of its suppletive forms; the information in the article goes beyond what you'd find in a dictionary (e.g. in Wiktionary), so value would certainly be lost if it were to be deleted. Victor Yus (talk) 06:37, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. — Mike  moral  ♪♫  06:33, 24 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - please closely read WP:NOTDIC (and wikt:WT:NOT) before nomming based on that policy. –Quiddity (talk) 18:09, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.