Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go Fish (2019)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. RL0919 (talk) 03:07, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

Go Fish (2019)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This film with notable actors but no significant coverage in reliable sources. If not deleted, it could be merged/redirected to Free Comic Book Day. Citrivescence (talk) 00:35, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Citrivescence (talk) 00:37, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 02:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 02:28, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect, at least for now, to Arcana Studio, the creator of the film, to avoid giving undue emphasis to a single arbitrary film/comic at Free Comic Book Day. I can only find brief, routine announcements of existence, not in depth coverage, and the nomination for a Xingguang Award does not satisfy WP:NFO. I can't vouch for the prestige of the Xingguang Award (in China or anywhere else), but if it's a relatively minor award then even winning it may not guarantee a stand-alone article. --Animalparty! (talk) 02:52, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:53, 22 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete or Drafitfy or something like that, out of mainspace. The film has been out for eight weeks. It will probably generate some coverage soon, but there is not enough now.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:17, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Draftify or delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if somebody can do better than this. As always, films are not handed an automatic notability freebie just because they exist — the notability test for films is the ability to show that they have been the subject of reliable source coverage in media, such as actual critical reviews and/or production coverage. But four of the five references here are simple directory entries, and the only one that isn't is a blog rather than a reliable source — and on a Google search, even using "go fish" film 2019 -troche as the search term to filter out hits on the 1994 film by Rose Troche, I still got more hits for the Rose Troche film than I got for this, and the ones I did get for this still weren't reliable or notability-supporting sources. So no, nothing here is enough and I can't find the necessary sources to fix it. Let's face it, this is basically a Finding Nemo knockoff. Bearcat (talk) 15:35, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Draft incase there are more rs reviews to come, could only find one by Commensense Media, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:44, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Drafitfy: although I am uncertain if there is enough coverage to meet the WP:GNG policy, it may receive more reviews in the future. I am in agreement with the above editors, and I would not be opposed to the article being recreated if further sources are found and incorporated into the article. I think this would be a fair compromise over outright deletion. Aoba47 (talk) 18:53, 28 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.