Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go Goodwins (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 12:48, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Go Goodwins
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable bus company again Fails GNG, (I had tagged it under G4 assuming it was created recently however after being rollbacked I've realized it was created back in April), Thanks – Davey 2010 Talk 12:03, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Also there was a first AFD however that for some reason deleted hence it not being above, cheers, – Davey 2010 Talk 12:05, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * I've moved the 2nd AFD to 1st and this nom to 2nd as the 2nd nom should've technically been the first anyway, Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 21:41, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:24, 29 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as by all means simply a local transportation company, I'm honestly not finding anything else better. SwisterTwister   talk  22:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep small article, well cited in both local and industry press. Cygnes64 (talk) 09:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
 * That's not actually convincing for convincing substance, however. SwisterTwister   talk  22:36, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:19, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- advertorial on an unremarkable company. Sources are insufficient to meet CORPDEPTH and GNG. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:22, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unremarkable local outfit. Fails WP:CORP.Charles (talk) 08:30, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 August 7.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 21:38, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.