Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go to Hell (Empress Of song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Even if it were not notable, redirecting to the artist's or the album's article should always be possible.  So Why  07:46, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Go to Hell (Empress Of song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NSONG for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. - MrX 16:33, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2017 July 12.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 16:53, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:23, 12 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak keep: I found some sources here, here, and here. I'm probably leaning towards weak keep. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 17:27, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure why I couldn't find those sources, but there does seem to be at least a possibility of notability. - MrX 17:38, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Billboard and Pitchfork are pretty high level/mainstream sources, and they're moderately detailed articles dedicated to the song itself. Enough to pass the WP:GNG. Sergecross73   msg me  20:32, 12 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.