Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goble


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Already deleted by User:Lectonar as patent nonsense. (G1) --Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:00, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Goble

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is NOT a dictionary Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:02, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nomination, or possibly speedily under WP:SNOWBALL or even WP:Nonsense. TrulyBlue (talk) 12:09, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong (speedy) delete or transwiki to Wiktionary: Wikipedia is not for dictionary entries. Den sock | Dendodge in public 12:21, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete as nonsense or at the very least utterly non-notable. No relevant ghits for the term "goble" in association with either "climbing" or "embellish", both of which are part of the definition of this word. andy (talk) 12:25, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment - It was speedy deleted, please close this. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 13:31, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.