Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gocycle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 17:33, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Gocycle

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Looks like an advertisement leaning strongly on About Karbon Kinetics Limited. The publication of this article, just days before the launch of their new product, makes me a bit cautious. Night of the Big Wind talk  22:21, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:48, 27 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: I didn't know about the launch - I thought the G2 was launched some time ago. My sole reason for posting the entry is that I've just acquired a Gocycle G1 and consider it sufficiently unusual a machine to be worth a page on Wikipedia. I have no relationship with Karbon Kinetics other than being a customer. I'd like to see some positive input to improve the article, perhaps a list of questions that need to be answered? Sejanus Aelianus (talk) 20:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep The vehicle has had significant press coverage in the UK. --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:01, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:19, 3 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources:
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 02:40, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 02:40, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 02:40, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 02:40, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * — Northamerica1000(talk) 02:40, 3 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per the above; significant coverage found in multiple independent reliable sources.  Gongshow  Talk 18:29, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.