Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/God


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy kept as a bad faith nomination.— Ryūlóng ( 竜 龍 ) 01:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

God

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Reason Meryl Kiniry 01:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)This article biases many religions and is an offense to many. Sure this is a very notable article but spiritually its wrong. --Meryl Kiniry 01:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Vandalism, be careful Meryl god may nominate you for deletion.--M8v2 01:05, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Note If you think it's wrong change it constructively make it better.--M8v2 01:06, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * This could be a good opportunity to discuss the role of this article. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy doesn't have an entry about God, instead they have Conceptions of God and something like our Existence of God. I personally think this article should be kept, but I am very confused about what material should be in it. Ideally, it should perhaps be a summary style thing. --Merzul 01:30, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Complete agreement with M8v2. Also, reason for marking AfD isn't in the deletion policy. Applekid 01:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. The nominating editor has a history of having been blocked from editing because of similar past nominations for deletion. In this case, I do not understand what "spiritually its wrong" means. It sounds like this might be a request that the Wikipedia community practice some form of censorship so as not to offend certain people. Such censorship is not practiced at Wikipedia (see WP:NOT. --JWSchmidt 01:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.