Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/God Save the Queen (parody)

God Save the Queen (parody)
Is this really necessary? -- Graham &#9786; | Talk 03:21, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete. Mediocre verse by a nobody. Even if it were bya somebody it should be in wikisource, not here --AlainV 03:24, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - stupid, non-encyclopedic. Cdc 04:15, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * That's the most offensive they got? Hmmmmm... B-. I'd like to see a bit more effort next time. Was a little lazy; lacked creativity. Gonna have to go with delete. -R. fiend 06:59, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Offensive and pointless. Down the toiletatory with it. Anthony Appleyard 09:33, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Don't seem to be much else to do than delete; that said, I find the original a bit more offensive at times. Shimgray 13:35, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wonder why it not speedy delete. utcursch 13:47, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)
 * Seems to be a speedy candidate to me as a user test. It seems to be a c&p from somewhere ("You clicked on this" and "If you read the edited version").  I'll wait, though, to see if anyone has dissent before acting upon it.  It's just potty mouth.   It can't hold a candle to some of the really good insults of the past.  Geogre 14:21, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Oops, I seem to have speedy deleted it by mistake. Does anyone want me to put it back?  (Incidentally, I clicked on it expecting to see the Sex Pistols' version.) Deb 18:53, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Whoopsie-daisey! A "mistake" eh? heh heh heh. No, I don't think anyone will be clamouring to have that back anytime soon. We could probably use a few more "mistakes" at times too. -R. fiend 20:25, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Royally delete-worthy. Take care not to undelete it accidentally, Deb. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 20:29, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)