Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godhong maple


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 22:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Godhong maple

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable organisation. PROD was contested without explanation. This page was a school project; most others from the same class have been deleted already. – Fayenatic  L ondon 22:13, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 22:36, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 22:36, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 22:36, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete This is a local Indonesian culture enthusiast group in Canada, but nothing to show it is notable. No claim of significance here. Hardly any coverage in RS to pass WP:ORGDEPTH. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 12:47, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Like other commercial and startups junks in here, NGO as usual want to do the blatant promotions on Wikipedia to show their notability. Just One of those so called NGO. Nothing to consider for Encyclopedic Material. Light2021 (talk) 17:02, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nordic   Nightfury  07:34, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as a largely unreferenced, promotional essay on an unremarkable organisation. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:50, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as stand alone article; could mention it in the city of Toronto article, but otherwise, non notable group and Wikipedia is not a newspaper. Kierzek (talk) 20:35, 2 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.