Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godson Umeh


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is more in depth coverage is needed Spartaz Humbug! 21:59, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Godson Umeh

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable jeweler that fails to meet WP:ANYBIO and WP:SIGCOV. Only coverage is from Guardian NG which speaks about a pendant he made for a footballer nothing more. Lapablo (talk) 11:37, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lapablo (talk) 11:37, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Lapablo (talk) 11:37, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Lapablo (talk) 11:37, 8 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep The page provides two reliable secondary sources (Guardian Nigeria, Businessday Nigeria), that are written by journalists and not just press releases. The sources also discuss the subject as the main topic. Angryapathy (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per Angryapathy. I also want to add that The Guardian is one of Nigeria's most respected newspapers and is seen by many as the country's paper of record. It's not just any old source - this is the Nigerian equivalent of coverage in the NY Times. &minus;&minus;&minus; Cactus Jack 🌵 05:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The Guardian sources cited in the article does nothing to confer notability. The first one isn't independent of the subject and the second is about the subject designing jewelries for a popular footballer's kids.  Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 15:58, 14 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete — @ &, asides the rationale provided by , a major concern here is that per WP:GNG, we require in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources. Yes, no doubt the subject is mentioned in reliable sources but I’m unsure if they discuss him with in-depth or significant coverage. Every source I see just announces how celebrities patronize him & nothing more. Celestina007 (talk) 19:12, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. The subject fails WP:GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Has not done anything noteworthy.  Versace1608   Wanna Talk? 15:55, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:BIO. Non-notable.  scope_creep Talk  00:28, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:18, 16 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.