Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godwin's law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snow keep. —Мандичка YO 😜 21:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

Godwin's law

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia_is_not_for_things_made_up_one_day  This was made up by a former lawyer for Wikipedia and should not be here per the above policy. Really should be deleted just as this one  and  this one  were deleted. ( Further it fails notability as well )   KoshVorlon    Rassekali ternii i mlechnye putiundefined  20:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - Wikipedia is not for things made up one day, but it is for things made up one day that meet general notability guidelines. In addition to refs cited in article, there's extensive coverage, , , , , ,  —Мандичка YO 😜 20:53, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - coverage in multiple reliable sources, meets WP:GNG. JoeSperrazza (talk) 20:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * All the Keep. This user has been vandalizing my talk page and removing my comments, because they are apparently offended that I don't take myself seriously. The only reason this was nominated was because I referenced it in a joke. Timothyjosephwood (talk) 21:11, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, that explains it. I'm closing this ridiculous AfD. —Мандичка YO 😜 21:29, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.