Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Godwin H. Ogbadu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:08, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Godwin H. Ogbadu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC. Professors are not generally considered notable and Wikipedia is not a place to publish your CV Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 16:51, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 16:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 16:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 16:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. His citation record on Google scholar looks like that of a successful academic but not enough to pass WP:PROF, and none of the other accomplishments listed in the article stand out to me as something that would confer notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep His publications at Google Scholar fall short of what is usually expected for a professor to have an article here per WP:ACADEMIC. However, at the Ahmadu Bello University he was chair of the biochemistry department, 1987-1993, and dean of the Faculty of Science, 1991-1994. Those are arguably notable positions. --MelanieN (talk) 04:31, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Being an head of a department and Dean of a faculty are not enough to meet WP:ACADEMIC threshold. Deans or head of a departments are generally not considered notable unless they meet one of more of the criteria listed at WP:ACADEMIC or other notability criteria. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 06:32, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   22:35, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Evidence of notability not enough. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:29, 11 March 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete per nom. I can't find any reason to believe he meets the notability guideline for academics or the general notability guideline. – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 21:32, 13 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.