Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goed Twee

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was speedy deletion at 21:37, 1 Jan 2005 by User:Andrevan who wrote nonsense vandalism vanity garbage

Goed Twee
Delete. Vanity.-gadfium 01:20, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Vanity at its worst. -RidG 01:37, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Repulsive vanity. This should be held up as an example to others. Rje 02:08, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete.Mikkalai 02:27, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete as horrendous vanity. Keeping this up for five days is too good for the guy, but what the hey. - Lucky 6.9 02:30, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, apparently vanity, notability not established in article. (Unless he really is a god, of course. That would be notable, but only if verifiable). Dpbsmith (talk) 03:05, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete&mdash;but fearfully. Everyking 04:25, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete?  Seems like this should be speedy-deletable as vandalism or as nonsense. In any case, Delete. --BM 19:04, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as silly vandalism. Wyss 23:27, 31 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.