Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goge Vandire


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 18:28, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Goge Vandire

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No real world context provided. Unlikey that any real world content can be supplied. No indpendednt sources provided, and I can not find any. Taemyr (talk) 01:08, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge. Too much detail on too minor a character. Better as a personal web page. JJL (talk) 01:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as yet more 40K cruft. This dude is probably as notable as a 40K character can get, but there's still not much hope of finding many sources outside what Games Workshop publish themselves. Reyk  YO!  02:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete wow is that a hell of a lot of unsourced bullshit about one insignificant video game character.MY♥IN chile 07:10, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and others. Pure fancrap with numerous issues in terms of notability, verifiability, plot summary, real-world content, etc. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 03:47, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No independent sources establish the notability of the subject. Protonk (talk) 00:18, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions.   -- Ned Scott 21:35, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions.   -- Ned Scott 21:36, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Transwiki and delete. Notability isn't supported by references that are independent of the publisher, Games Workshop, the makers of the game.  --Craw-daddy | T | 08:14, 21 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.