Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goji (financial services)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:59, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

Goji (financial services)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable financial institution where the PROD was removed by the creator under the reasoning that since they had removed the category of peer-to-peer lending institution, the PROD rationale was no longer valid. This is a non-notable firm that has no coverage that meets WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Little more than a promotional directory listing. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:38, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom- sources don't go in depth enough. jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:39, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - The main thing here is WP:CORPDEPTH, of which there is none. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.