Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golborne High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep, as the references provided in the references section are sufficient to establish the notability of this school per Wikipedia's general notability guideline. John254 00:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Golborne High School

 * – (View AfD) (View log) Can't find where this is notable. Cheers, :) Dloh cierekim   19:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)  Cheers, :) Dloh cierekim   19:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy keep - nom withdrawn. Missed or did not see the BBC coverage. Thanks to all. Cheers, :) Dloh cierekim  23:10, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * delete. Wikipedia is not the yellow pages.--Victor falk 21:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC) Keep--Victor falk 23:20, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, I found some citations, also high schools are generally keepers. SolidPlaid 22:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Are they? Why for?--Victor falk 23:17, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, high school is where most people start doing notable things, and since most high schools have lots of students over the years, something notable usually turns up. They're like small towns with high rates of population turnover. Any given high school has an alumni population on the order of 50,000. And that doesn't include the usual spate of newspaper articles on the school itself. SolidPlaid 23:22, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * But that makes most or almost all of them notable then. Why not say all high schools are automatically notable then?--Victor falk 23:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Because a small, recently opened high school might not be notable. SolidPlaid 19:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep information added to the article using reliable and verifiable sources demonstrates notability. Alansohn 22:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, seems notable. CRGreathouse (t | c) 00:22, 12 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.