Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 13:28, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Gold.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Film that lacks non-trivial secondary support. Fails WP:NOTFILM. red dogsix (talk) 17:55, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sources can be found - I wasn't able to find anything third party that wasn't just a listing, perhaps it's just too soon? Artw (talk) 18:43, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Artw (talk) 18:46, 22 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I do think it it may well just be a question of WP:TOOSOON. It would have been better to have waited for the premieres, coming soon. Can this be userfied or turned into a draft article? It's not a bad little article and there's a decent chance we'll have a few reliable sources for it. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:11, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah WP:TOOSOON, I'd support a move back to the draft namespace. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 00:43, 23 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:13, 22 June 2015 (UTC)


 * year/type:
 * filmmaker:


 * Delete for being TOO SOON. It is admittedly difficult for short doc films to gain the requisite coverage even after release, and even with it soon-to-screen at short film festivals... July 4th in Berlin and July 5th at Mykonos Biennale in Greece, simply screening is not a notability. As it is beginning to catch some minor attention, it can userfied back to contributor  with a thank you but a polite explanation that simply screening at even a notable festival is not a notability unless also receiving commentary and analysis in reliable sources... and even if lacking notability enough for its own article, it can always be spoken of in that of its filmmaker, Alexander Tuschinski.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 01:51, 23 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.