Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold (Novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 14:38, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

Gold (Novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of notability. Still over 6 months from being published so no chance of third party reviews or anything significant for some time yet. Does not meet the threshold criteria and as an unpublished work is specifically discouraged. Due for publication in June 2012. noq (talk) 16:08, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:07, 7 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. The book hasn't been released yet and hasn't gotten any sort of publicity that would be considered reliable. It's just WP:TOOSOON. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 11:46, 8 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Delete in accordance with Tokyogirl79 and WP:CRYSTAL. The inclusion of the article may be justifiable in the future, but for now, it fails WP:GNG. Chris (talk) 23:07, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:34, 14 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --Madison-chan (talk) 23:00, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Madison-chan
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.