Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold Coast Tourist Shuttle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was merged. — Kurykh  23:37, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Gold Coast Tourist Shuttle

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears unnotable and unencyclopaedic. Orderinchaos 22:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC) * Strong delete Per nom. And I thought the article for Beerenberg Farm was pushing the boundaries of WP:N, but this is beyond a joke. Thewinchester (talk) 00:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.   -- Orderinchaos 22:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. In addition Wikipedia is not a travel guide. -- Mattinbgn/talk 23:58, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete This will not be missed. Mandsford 00:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Let's not forget WP:NOTE. NSR 77  T C  01:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge with Surfside Buslines. No reason for it to have a standalone article. Capitalistroadster 02:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete / Merge Not a famous shuttle or bus line. --Hdt83 Chat 05:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to the parent company of Surfside Buslines. Not famous for an article on its own. --Arnzy (talk · contribs) 09:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge Per Arnzy. Sensable suggestion. Thewinchester (talk) 02:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per Arnzy. This particular service is not notable, but the company is.  Lankiveil 04:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC).
 * Merge until someone shows that this particular route in itself meets WP:N or WP:CORP or some other criteria.Garrie 22:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable and has no reliable sources to assert it as such. ( [ →]O - RLY?) 02:38, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge per Arnzy. Nicko (Talk•Contribs) 05:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge - appears unnotable because of lack of work on article - however in current form merge SatuSuro 08:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.