Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold Rush Boys (1983 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 14:34, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

Gold Rush Boys (1983 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NOTFILM and the GNG. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits. No reliable sources. The article claims the film's notability rests on "its attention to period costumes and furnishings," a thin and unsupported claim, even for a porn film. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:36, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't see anything in the article that meets notability guidelines. All I could find with google was one short (4-sentence) review from what looks to be a website related to TLA Releasing; not enough in my opinion to count as "significant coverage in reliable sources".-- Beloved Freak  20:37, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:26, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 21:26, 13 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing notable to distinguish this film from the other mountains of mountains of such gay porn films, and during that era.Curb Chain (talk) 07:40, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ghits are to WP and mirrors, sales sites, and pirate sites. Thin Imdb entry with no external reviews listed, and I can find none, either. Fails WP:GNG. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 09:50, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.