Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold Wake Press


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 09:52, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Gold Wake Press

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unreferenced article on online and print magazine with only included authors used to assert notability; does not meet general notability guideline (GNG) or proposed notability guidelines for periodicals Notability_(periodicals). Dialectric (talk) 14:48, 5 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete, no secondary sources at all. Abductive  (reasoning) 03:50, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.