Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold of prague


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:45, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Gold of prague

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a promotional article for a non-notable brewery that hasn't even started brewing yet. The article has no independent sources to establish notability. A previous proposed deletion was removed by the article's creator. Deli nk (talk) 13:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  15:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  15:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Speedy delete per WP:A7. No credible claim of significance. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. - Iago Qnsi (talk) 16:11, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep I declined the speedy as a news search brought up this Korea Times piece that talks a bit about the brewery. There are quite a few Polish and Korean news pieces as well that somebody should check., , , , The article needs work with somebody who can speak one (or ideally both) of those languages but the potential to improve the article to acceptable standards is there. Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)  17:34, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Every source has merely a mention, just as the Korea Times does. It's usually in context of other investments by Czech firms, or other businesses in the center.  (Even the Korean one has enough word in Roman alphabet brand names to show that it istalkingabout multiple brandsof beer, not this one).  DGG ( talk ) 00:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as too soon at best, there's some coverage but none of this is convincing enough notability and that the company will have considerable time history (I.e. plans may not actually blossom). SwisterTwister   talk  03:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep (of course, I am the author) As for the previous proposed deletion, I contacted the editor that proposed for deletion with the following: "Hi, thanks for your feedback on my article about the brewery in Korea. I went through all of the linked pages with rules and still have to ask for clarifiation of your opinion. My article is not a guess, it is (as the WP:CRYSTAL requests) about an event that is already in preparation. So, maybe you would take back your proposal, if I inserted more info about what is going on right now? Thanks for letting me know." I got no reply, so I deleted the proposal. Here I provide some more news references - in english this time:, even the arhitecture of the building is notable: . Czech Beer with over 1000 years of tradition being introduced in Korea. I will enrich the article with more references or external links. Martinluhan (talk) 00:27, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 19:39, 9 March 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete for now, and reinstate in the future. As others have already mentioned, this article violates WP:CRYSTAL, as the company involved is hardly a "company" at all at this point. If they're not going to produce beer until 2017, then they shouldn't have an article until 2017. Colonel Wilhelm Klink (Complaints|Mistakes) 20:45, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:34, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice, due to lack of significant coverage from reliable publications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:36, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per Yamaguchi.4meter4 (talk) 18:38, 16 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.