Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldberg Segalla


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)

Goldberg Segalla

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Reads like G11 promotion of the firm. I almost speedy-deleted it right there, but given the history and the fact that it was at one point accepted through the AFC process, I figured I would go through the AFD process instead. The sources seem to be largely press releases, the sources from the Buffalo News come up as 404 when I tried them just now. , how different is the current status of the article from when you accepted a couple years ago? Bkissin (talk) 19:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete this isn't Linked in, I don't need a list of every office you have. There are no articles discussing the firm, beyond confirming they exist. Routine law firm from what I see. Oaktree b (talk) 20:42, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Companies,  and New York.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:17, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as written. I would actually expect a firm this size and with this breadth to have coverage showing notability, but keeping this in the encyclopedia as is would be detrimental to the credibility of the project. Current sources are excessively local or not independent. BD2412  T 21:23, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as written. This article is entirely the work of single-purpose editors and has a smell of UPE.  I think I made a mistake seven years ago.  It has been expanded since I accepted it, but the expansion has been the addition of corporate stuff and of puffery.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.