Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldco Precious Metals


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The consensus is that the available sources are insufficient to establish notability. Deor (talk) 13:32, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Goldco Precious Metals

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sources provided are press releases, blogs, the Better Business Bureau and other trivial directory listings that do not impart notability. A quick Google News search also reveals only press releases. Even if they were notable, practically speaking the article would be better-off starting from scratch to avoid the promotion. CorporateM (Talk) 18:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (soliloquize)  @ 20:39, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Rcsprinter123     (message)  @ 20:39, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (tell)  @ 18:25, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete; non-notable.--Раціональне анархіст (talk) 05:37, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Including Heritage Gold Group in the searches appears to be enough to be WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 02:38, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I do not find either this company or its subsidiary Heritage Gold Group to be notable. Coverage is routine, "awards" are trivial. Not actually surprising since the company has been in business less than 10 years. --MelanieN (talk) 02:19, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see coverage beyond press releases. --Michig (talk) 09:10, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sources do not sufficiently support notability.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  02:00, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.