Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden's method


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 06:20, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

Golden's method

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence that this is anything other than an a hoax. Search on Taylor Gorden provides no results and the lack of ref is a significant issue.  Velella  Velella Talk 11:20, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. It's plausible enough that something like this works, so I wouldn't call it a hoax exactly, but with no sources it's still original research. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:57, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:43, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - the article does not show that the equation is notable or why it is notable.--Rpclod (talk) 20:25, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence whatsoever of notability. PianoDan (talk) 14:55, 23 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.