Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden Amur


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Closing as nominator Withdrew. -Djsasso (talk) 04:30, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

Golden Amur
Amazingly NN sports club. Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 03:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Withdrawn I'm withdrawing my nom for deletion due to article being ref'd and improved, this is a great result, thanks all for contributing to discussion. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 03:03, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


 * That's not true, so 'keep. Punkmorten (talk) 10:01, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Plois explain! -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 11:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak keep whilst article is a very poor stub, the team formerly played in the Asia League Ice Hockey major pro league. Would probably pass WP:ORG with a few sources. --Breno talk 11:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * You wouldn't want to make finding references for non-notable defunct ice-hockey clubs your no.1 hobby by any chance would you? -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 11:35, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Pretty much do ;) -Djsasso (talk) 17:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hockey-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  12:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  12:56, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. While defunct, the team did still play professional hockey at the highest level available to them. At stub may me all this article may be, but It should at least be that. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 14:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Professional ice hockey teams clearly pass notability. I've also expanded the stub with a few sources, that were found in seconds. Due to the team's short tenure, it may never be more than a stub. Flibirigit (talk) 16:30, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Professional team that definately meets the standards. -Djsasso (talk) 17:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. It was a fully professional team in a notable league.  Resolute 18:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. I recall nhl.com referring to the team back when it was in business on at least once, so it obviously passes notability. Kaiser matias (talk) 02:55, 10 January 2008 (UTC) nhl.com had an article, here that mentioned the folding of the club. Article discusses the importance of the Asian Ice Hockey League. Kaiser matias (talk) 02:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: There are no grounds, if properly sourced, to deny the notability of a professional sports franchise; heck, we've got articles on Tier II junior teams. Looks like this is shaping up to be a WP:SNOW candidate.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by RGTraynor (talk • contribs) 03:58, 10 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.