Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden Angels


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:50, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

Golden Angels

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Also..

Golden Angels and their albums do not appear to be notable for a Wikipedia article. The article consists of miscellaneous details, which seem to be overly written and full of irrelevant detail that only a devoted fan would find worthwhile, i.e. it mentions other bands such as Angelman and Earthsaver, who are also of no importance. The article has a history section with links to album articles, which have zero notability and a full essay on their music videos, which would only interest a devotee. There are no citations for reliable sources, just a fan site and three Youtube videos. I've searched Google and cannot find anything which supports this articles existence. I suggest that this article be deleted asap.Wayne Paine (talk) 14:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only links given are to the band's own site and a couple of YouTubes, and I can't find any proper independent coverage. I can find no source for the "Golden Guitar" they were supposedly awarded - the only other mention I can find is a Wikipedia mirror. Regarding their albums, I can't find any sign of the label LMNtal records other than Wikipedia mirrors and only in the context of Golden Angels - and that doesn't sound like the "two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels" that would satisfy WP:NM. No sign that any of their singles charted anywhere. I can find some hits on the chords for their singles, like, but that's about all. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:02, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. Absolutely nothing about this band online. The videos and music are decidedly amateur and this article seems nothing more than a self-created, self-aggrandising vehicle for a band of no importance. Good luck to them, but for now, they're in no way notable. Calgarykid47 (talk) 16:30, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:21, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Big  Dom  23:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:04, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.