Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden Bay (district)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Golden Bay. v/r - TP 01:21, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Golden Bay (district)

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete. Golden Bay exists but there is no district or area known as "Golden Bay" as described in this article. There are other place names in NZ called "Golden Bay" but that is not relevant to this AfD. Also, confusion may arise with the districts of New Zealand which are defined political entities.  Not sure if any of the content can be salvaged for relevant Tasman Region articles.  I will use the map for the Golden Bay. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  —-- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment There appears to be content here (though unreferenced) that does not appear in Golden Bay. Is any of this content useful in your opinion, Alan, and can it be referenced properly and added to other articles?  I don't want to reflexively say "keep" but I don't want to eliminate useful content either.  Cullen 328   Let's discuss it  09:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think there is anything that is worth salvaging. I have used the images in the Golden Bay article. The content is covered by Tasman Region and related geographical articles. As I said, it will be an ongoing source of confusion and its existence has no basis in official naming. It seems that in common vernacular the plain adjacent to the bay is called Golden Bay but if that can be referenced (dfficult?) it can be added to the Golden Bay article. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 09:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note Golden Bay and Golden Bay (district) were once one article. I had split the articles assuming they were both legitimate topics.    A rbitrarily 0    ( talk ) 16:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.