Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden Goblin Press


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Unaussprechlichen Kulten. Daniel (talk) 09:28, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Golden Goblin Press

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fictional entity. I prodded this with "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. Note: the cited " The Encyclopedia Cthulhiana" is a in-universe overview and so neither indendent nor particularly reliable." PROD was challenged, so here we go. I'll just add that the entry in 'Encyclopedia Cthulhiana' is an in-universe plot summary which only nods to real world by citing fiction works this entity appears in (it is effectively a pre-internet era fan-wiki, and our own entry clearly describes it as a supplement for an RPG game). The only WP:ATD I can think of is to redirect this to Unaussprechlichen Kulten, the only Wikipedia article that mentions this entity. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  05:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  05:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  05:03, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Merge per nom. Plausible/non-confusing redirect, even if niche, but no reason for it to be a standalone article outside the one presumably notable fictional work fictionally published by this fictional corporation. Jclemens (talk) 06:15, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Unaussprechlichen Kulten. I don't think anything needs to be merged.  It appears to be a pretty small plot point element in a single story of a huge mythos. -2pou (talk) 15:56, 31 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.