Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden Mice NFT


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was already draftified to Draft:Golden Mice NFT by User:WhoAteMyButter, with the redirect to the draft already speedily deleted by User:Fastily as a cross-namespace redirect per WP:CSD. Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:25, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Golden Mice NFT

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I would say it fails WP:GNG, there are multiple sources attached, many of them considered reliable. But, almost all of them seem to be "advertising", with the fox news article straight up labelling their article as "Advertising content". Daiyusha (talk) 04:39, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Article has been draftified, But I think afd should remain, this article is solely backed by promotional references. Daiyusha (talk) 04:41, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete: I had originally moved the article to draftspace, in hope that the author would find better sourcing. Unfortunately, I've quickly realized that any dubious sources out there are all going to be advertising press releases. There's simply nothing indicating its notability, and this looks like a case of someone trying to get an article on something they made and using themselves thinly disguised as a source. All the sources in there now are verbatim press releases to each other and not reliable sources at all. Some don't even talk about the subject to begin with. WhoAteMyButter  ( 📨talk │ 📝contribs ) 04:46, 23 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.