Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden Scythe Horror Awards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  01:30, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Golden Scythe Horror Awards

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

completely and utterly non notable award, created by an LTA (see Caillou Pettis and associated SPI cases, etc...) with no significant or meaningful coverage in actual RS. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 01:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Awards, Canada,  and United States of America.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  01:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can only find Instagram and The Movie Blog posts about this award, not seeing notability. No coverage outside of these sources. Oaktree b (talk) 02:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete a quick look tells me it's some kind of elaborated hoax. No serious sources at all, don't think there's any event or any awards at all. Tehonk (talk) 06:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I doubt it's a hoax in the strictest sense, and more likely a thing Caillou Pettis invented by himself and announces "winners" of by himself. The dude's been such a relentlessly self-promoting and self-Wikipedia-inserting wannabe in the past that this is probably just his latest "get myself into Wikipedia by any means possible" scheme. Bearcat (talk) 18:09, 31 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete. Christmas crackers, not this Caillou Pettis dude again. As always, awards are not "inherently" notable just because they exist, and have to show evidence of passing WP:GNG on reliable source coverage about them in real media, not self-promotion on social networking or blogs. Bearcat (talk) 17:56, 31 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.