Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden era of the NES


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:43, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Golden era of the NES
Unverified and possibly editorial in nature. There really doesn't seem to be anything here that isn't already covered in the main Nintendo Entertainment System article. – Sean Daugherty (talk) 23:42, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:46, 31 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete; nothing worth keeping from this OR stub. Nifboy 17:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. Nifboy 17:57, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as OR. How can an "era" be two years?  ColourBurst 18:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * An era does not have to be a long period of time, definition of era -- zero faults   ' '' 19:19, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Daveydweeb ( chat/patch ) 21:56, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete obviously OR. Danny Lilithborne 00:10, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete OR. guitarhero777777 01:37, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: I think the NES golden era was over when the SNES came out. 11:33, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Combination 21:49, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Kopf1988 00:03, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious POV &rArr;    SWAT Jester    Ready    Aim    Fire!  03:24, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - pretty pointless article. --FlyingPenguins 07:43, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.