Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldgenie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 18:42, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Goldgenie

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Insufficient notability to satisfy the revised requirements of WP:NCORP. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:35, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ― Abelmoschus Esculentus  talk /  contribs 12:47, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. ― Abelmoschus Esculentus  talk /  contribs 12:47, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. ― Abelmoschus Esculentus  talk /  contribs 12:47, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ifnord (talk) 19:29, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:37, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails the criteria for notability, fails WP:NCORP and GNG.  HighKing++ 15:58, 10 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.