Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldie (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. KTC (talk) 00:08, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Goldie (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NSONGS. "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been independently released as a recording by several notable artists, bands or groups." Also no coverage in multiple reliable sources to support notability. Redirect challenged by creator of the page.  STATic  message me!  17:52, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 30 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Coverage at Rolling Stone (where it was ranked the #27 song of 2012), MTV  (where it was nominated for a VMA award ), Billboard  (where the song charted, albeit not on the main Hot 100 ), Pitchfork  and more .  Gong   show  20:17, 1 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Would not have been nominated if this information would have been noted in the article prior.  STATic    message me!   21:16, 1 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per Gongshow. Coverage needs to exist; it's not required that it be present in the article, although of course that would be helpful. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 02:41, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep This song has been ranked on a significant chart, which would make it notable per WP:NSONGS. CrimsonBlue (talk) 06:27, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.