Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldman Sachs IPOs


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Davewild (talk) 21:26, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Goldman Sachs IPOs

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Likely non-notable attempt at a list of IPOs by a company. I'm sure there is a lot of information on individual companies getting "IPOed" by this particular company, but I'm not sure if the subject as a whole is notable.  Samuel  Tan  07:42, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Okay, it's probably a worthwhile list... but I'm not sure that Wikipedia is the place for such a list. I would think that G-S would have the list on their website, then we would just dupliate it.--Paul McDonald (talk) 11:37, 25 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Scientizzle 15:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Prior to Glass-Steagall's repeal, a vast majority of GS's non-investment activities were managing IPO's for corporations. A proper list may be helpful for readers of the encyclopedia, but this will likely not turn into that list.  The topic is notable and probably does not fail WP:NOT, but this list is ad hoc and unreferenced.  My suggestion is to delete this, leave it as a red link and impose no prejudice on recreation in another form.  Preferably someone would create a List of Goldman Sachs IPOs of which we all can be proud.  Also, I cleaned up the NPOV elements of the stub.  whoever tagged the article should be pointed to Issues or at least admonished to not flood the article with ZOMG tags. Protonk (talk) 18:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. and Protonk. JohnCD (talk) 16:23, 5 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.