Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldmedal Electricals (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  14:14, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Goldmedal Electricals
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND. Refs are routine business and operations news   scope_creep Talk  13:53, 1 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Comments Lets examine the references:
 * Profile. Fails WP:ORGIND, WP:SIRS Non-notable trade award.
 * Routine annoucement. Press-release. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
 * Press-release. Routine annoucement.Fails WP:CORPDEPTH
 * Listing of the companies products. Fails WP:SIRS, WP:CORPDEPTH.
 * Press-release. Fails WP:SIRS, WP:CORPDEPTH.
 * Press-release. Fails WP:SIRS, WP:CORPDEPTH.
 * Profile.Press-release. Fails WP:ORGIND.
 * Press-release. Routine annoucement. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH.
 * ] Press-release. Fails WP:ORGIND.

Out of the 9 references, 7 are press-releases, one is a prodcuts listing and one is small insignificant news article from this UPE. Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NCORP.  scope_creep Talk  13:53, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Shellwood (talk) 14:11, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Can we get some views on this. Thanks.   scope_creep Talk  14:18, 1 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maharashtra-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:02, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Everybody in India knows this brand since its popular, so dk why nominator wants to delete it Because competitor brands are already on wikipedia, contributors must consider this Sharayugawai (talk) 21:05, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
 * We do not in fact need to consider whether competitors of a company are the subject of articles; see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Wikipedia is not here to advertise for companies at all, even equally, and it isn't a directory of businesses.  The relevant guideline for when to write an article about a business is WP:NCORP, which this business doesn't appear to meet no matter how many people have heard of it.  FalconK (talk) 23:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, as I wrote last week, in concurrence with User:scope_creep's source analysis; this company is not notable and the article is a promo. FalconK (talk) 23:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
 * No its not promotional point single line its promotional if its there remove its the point of discussion of deletion, if there is any promotional or advertising content editors should remove it Sharayugawai (talk) 21:41, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * just the the information not the whole article Sharayugawai (talk) 21:41, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROMO and WP:NCORP. Sources in the article fail WP:CORPDEPTH because they are trivial coverage of announcements of non-notable awards received by the organization, sponsorship of events, expansion [...] of the business, annual financial results and earning forecasts, hiring [...] of personnel and a product line launch. An online search finds similiar trivial coverage of routine announcements. Beccaynr (talk) 02:59, 7 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.