Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golem (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Article is in a different and better condition now than it was when nominated. (Non admin closure). — Qst 18:13, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Golem (band)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Nothing special. No links. -- Metal Head (talk) 18:46, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was just about to hit delete per CSD:A7 but it's borderline. Stifle (talk) 19:18, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. 5 minutes searching found plenty of reviews on metal sites. The Metal Observer and Metal-Rules.com  look legit. There are others out there as well.-- Nydas (Talk) 22:40, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I've added what Nydas linked and a few others. (As far as I can tell, these are sources with editorial oversight and hence reliable, but given the language barrier, I am not 100% sure.) The band has been around a while, has several releases on what seem to be major indie labels and has garnered international attention. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 15:16, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of sources out there; those added clearly establish the group as worthy of an article. Chubbles (talk) 20:30, 17 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.